We value your privacy

We use necessary cookies to run the site and, with your consent, analytics and marketing cookies to improve it. You can change your choice anytime. Privacy Policy

  • Security
  • Pricing
Book a scoping call
  1. Help Center
  2. Compliance & frameworks
  3. Illinois HB 3773 — AI in employment
Browse categories
Getting started
Shield Control
Shield Web
Policies & presets
Compliance & frameworks
  • DIFC Regulation 10 — AI & autonomous systems
  • EU AI Act — Provider vs deployer (roles & when the line shifts)
  • EU AI Act Article 26 — Deployer obligations
  • EU AI Act Article 4 — AI literacy
  • EU AI Act Article 5 — Prohibited practices
  • EU AI Act Article 50 — Transparency obligations
  • EU AI Act Article 6 — High-risk classification
  • GDPR Article 32 — Security of processing
  • GDPR Article 5 — Principles of processing
  • GDPR Article 6 — Lawfulness of processing
  • Illinois HB 3773 — AI in employment
  • ISO/IEC 42001 — AI management system
  • Korea AI Basic Act — trustworthy AI obligations
  • NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)
  • NYC Local Law 144 — Automated employment decision tools
Admin & security
Troubleshooting
FAQ
Getting started
Shield Control
Shield Web
Policies & presets
Compliance & frameworks
  • DIFC Regulation 10 — AI & autonomous systems
  • EU AI Act — Provider vs deployer (roles & when the line shifts)
  • EU AI Act Article 26 — Deployer obligations
  • EU AI Act Article 4 — AI literacy
  • EU AI Act Article 5 — Prohibited practices
  • EU AI Act Article 50 — Transparency obligations
  • EU AI Act Article 6 — High-risk classification
  • GDPR Article 32 — Security of processing
  • GDPR Article 5 — Principles of processing
  • GDPR Article 6 — Lawfulness of processing
  • Illinois HB 3773 — AI in employment
  • ISO/IEC 42001 — AI management system
  • Korea AI Basic Act — trustworthy AI obligations
  • NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)
  • NYC Local Law 144 — Automated employment decision tools
Admin & security
Troubleshooting
FAQ

Illinois HB 3773 — AI in employment

Updated July 5, 2026·1 min readAll plans

Note: this explainer is informational and framework references are never a compliance guarantee — align your program with your legal counsel.

What HB 3773 requires

Illinois HB 3773 amends the Illinois Human Rights Act, effective January 1, 2026: employers may not use AI in a way that discriminates in recruitment, hiring, promotion, discipline, discharge, or other terms of employment — including using ZIP codes as a proxy for protected classes — and must notify employees when AI is used for such decisions.

What it means for your company

The duty attaches to use, not to procurement: a recruiter running candidate CVs through a general-purpose chatbot is AI use in an employment decision, whether or not HR ever bought an "AI hiring tool". To give the required notice — and to defend against a discrimination claim — you first need to know where AI actually touches employment decisions in your organization.

How Shield operationalizes it

The Monitor AI use in HR decisions preset (referenced to Illinois HB 3773) logs usage of discovered HR and recruiting AI tools into the audit trail — the evidence base for the notice and non-discrimination duties. It applies automatically to whichever such tools your organization has discovered, so coverage tracks reality instead of a static list.

Apply it via the preset library; it ships in the US AI in Employment bundle.

The outcome

A current, factual inventory of AI in your employment workflows: you know whom to notify, which tools your policies must govern, and you hold usage records if a decision is ever challenged.

Was this article helpful?

Related articles

Apply policy presets and bundles

Deploy compliance-ready policies from the preset library — EU AI Act, GDPR, DIFC, Korea AI Basic Act, US AI in Employment, and ISO 42001/NIST bundles.

Read article

NYC Local Law 144 — Automated employment decision tools

New York City requires a bias audit and candidate notice before an automated employment decision tool may be used. What LL 144 covers and how Shield keeps your AEDT inventory honest.

Read article

DIFC Regulation 10 — AI & autonomous systems

DIFC Regulation 10 governs personal data processed through autonomous and semi-autonomous systems. Who counts as Deployer and Operator, the core duties, and how Shield helps you meet them.

Read article

EU AI Act — Provider vs deployer (roles & when the line shifts)

EU AI Act provider vs deployer: what separates a deployer (Betreiber) from a provider (Anbieter) under Article 3, and the Article 25 triggers that turn a deployer into a provider of a high-risk system.

Read article

Still stuck?

Send us the details — we answer within one business day.

Contact support

On this page

  • What HB 3773 requires
  • What it means for your company
  • How Shield operationalizes it
  • The outcome

Subscribe to our newsletter

Product and governance updates — see our privacy policy.

AI security and control for every model your team uses.

Built in Dubai. Designed for teams operating across regions, models, and regulatory environments.

  • Product

    • Shield Web
    • Shield Control
    • Shield Desktop
    • Shield Mobile
    • Pricing
    • Download
  • Solutions

    • For CISOs
    • For Operations
    • For AI Teams
  • Use Cases

    • AI Governance
    • AI Agent Security
    • LLM Access Control
    • Secure AI Deployment
    • Enterprise Operations
    • Financial Services
    • HR & Recruiting
  • Resources

    • Help Center
    • Blog
    • Guides
    • Glossary
    • Changelog
    • Compare
    • FAQ
  • Company

    • About
    • Careers
    • Security & Trust
    • Contact
  • Tools

    • Disclose
    • AI Risk Calculator
    • EU AI Act Checker

© 2026 Qadar AI. All rights reserved.

  • ·Legal
  • ·Privacy
  • ·Terms
  • ·Partner Terms
  • ·GDPR / DPA
  • ·